Energy transition will be challenging in era of public protests, regulatory hurdles | CBC News

From carbon seize and hydrogen growth to the accelerated rollout of wind and solar energy and speedy electrification of transportation methods, the federal authorities has laid out an bold roadmap to get Canada to its local weather goal of reducing emissions by 40 per cent under 2005 ranges by 2030, and net-zero emissions by 2050.

However overhauling this nation’s complete power infrastructure in a brief period of time represents an unprecedented technical problem that can value tons of of billions of {dollars}, consultants say.

And pessimists are fast to level out that Canada would not have latest monitor document in relation to getting bold, costly infrastructure initiatives over the end line.

In Alberta specifically — the place the ghosts of cancelled pipeline initiatives nonetheless hang-out the general public consciousness — some observers consider this nation has misplaced the political will and spirit of nationwide unity that is required to get huge issues completed.

“We have spent a decade making constructing something extraordinarily tough, if not unattainable,” stated Calgary-based power analyst, oil companies sector government and guide David Yager.

“Canada’s latest historical past suggests these [net-zero] targets are aspirational, to say the least.”

Troubled Canadian power initiatives

Yager factors to Enbridge Inc.’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, which was quashed by the federal Liberals in 2016.

In 2017, the proposed $15.7-billion Power East venture was cancelled by TransCanada after being slowed down by regulatory delays, new environmental standards, and opposition to the road alongside main sections of the proposed route.

Then in 2021, TC Power’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline venture was cancelled by U.S. president Joe Biden — the fruits of a decade-plus battle that had pitted the power trade towards environmentalists against the venture.

There are lots of different high-profile examples of troubled Canadian power initiatives, from the Coastal GasLink pipeline — the development of which led to rail blockades throughout the nation by Indigenous opponents of the venture and their supporters — to Pacific Northwest LNG, a proposed liquefied pure fuel terminal in Prince Rupert, B.C., which was scrapped by Malaysia’s Petronas and companions in 2017 partly due to considerations raised by native Indigenous teams concerning the venture’s influence on salmon spawning grounds within the space.

Whereas the Trans Mountain pipeline enlargement goes forward, the prices of that venture have ballooned to $21.4 billion after being purchased by the federal authorities for $4.5 billion in 2018.

Trans Mountain has been dogged by elevated safety prices, route modifications to keep away from culturally and environmentally delicate areas, and scheduling delays associated to allowing processes, amongst different points.

Working into opposition

Opponents of those initiatives say the cancellations and delays present the necessity to finish reliance on the fossil gasoline trade and transfer towards greener power manufacturing.

Nevertheless it is not simply oil and fuel initiatives which are turning into more and more tough to construct nowadays, Yager stated. In Ontario, wind farm initiatives have been cancelled as a result of they pose threats to bat populations.

In Quebec, a proposed hydro line that may have carried clear energy to Massachusetts was scrapped after residents of tiny Maine refused to permit transmission by means of their state.

“You may’t even construct a cellphone tower anymore with out working into opposition,” Yager stated. “The place do you assume you would put a brand new hydro dam these days? Nowhere.”

‘All of these items can have a footprint’

Consultants have advised that Canada should double, maybe even triple, the scale of its electrical energy grid by 2050 as a way to meet its net-zero objectives.

That may require not simply new transmission infrastructure, however interprovincial co-operation on new regional interties to assist join areas with entry to scrub energy to areas nonetheless reliant on coal.

As well as, the federal authorities desires to extend Canadian manufacturing of crucial minerals akin to copper, aluminum and lithium as a way to assist a home provide chain for the electrical automobile trade.

The prospect is daunting, stated Warren Mabee, director of the Institute for Power and Environmental Coverage at Queen’s College in Kingston, Ont.

“All of these items have a footprint, and are going to be a problem to implement,” he stated.

Political will

Canada is not the one jurisdiction the place large-scale infrastructure initiatives more and more face regulatory and social licence challenges.

It is a related story within the U.S. and in Europe, Mabee stated, including there’s an actual danger that firms within the clear power house will default to the growing world or different jurisdictions the place the foundations aren’t as tight and the general public would not get as a lot of a say in the place and the way issues are constructed.

He added he believes it is doable for Canada to advance its net-zero objectives, however he stated the federal government might want to clearly talk what the imaginative and prescient is — after which have the political will to implement it.

“The extent of effort that is going to be required shall be corresponding to the COVID-19 pandemic response,” Mabee stated.

The general public curiosity

However Donna Kennedy-Glans, a former oil trade government who served as Alberta’s affiliate minister for electrical energy and renewable power from 2013 to 2014, stated she would not assume initiatives carried out within the identify of power transition will come up towards the identical sort of hurdles that the oil and fuel trade has confronted in recent times.

She stated whereas there are actually individuals who oppose large-scale wind and photo voltaic farms, a few of the greatest renewable power initiatives on this planet are blossoming throughout Alberta proper now, and on the whole, the regulatory course of has gone easily.

“Only a few individuals are stepping as much as attempt to cease this … the individuals who complain are being considered as being against inexperienced power, and that is actually not a snug house to be in,” Kennedy-Glans stated.

She added that she believes even the large-scale expropriation of personal land for brand new transmission strains, for instance, will face comparatively little political and regulatory pushback if it is carried out within the identify of local weather change.

“There shall be a special stage of political will to see that completed,” Kennedy-Glans stated. “I do assume that individuals in affected communities shall be upset by it … however it should come right down to a query of ‘is that this within the public curiosity and is it the correct factor to do?'”

Leave a Comment